Search for: "In re S.E" Results 121 - 140 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
We're not just talking about cocaine, barbiturates, and methamphetamines, or even the long lists of drugs found at 21 U.S.C.A. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:16 am by Jamie Markham
(Note the difference between this case and In re Dunn, 738 S.E.2d 198 (2013), which deemed the requirement to hear a petition to terminate sex offender registration in the county of conviction to be a jurisdictional requirement.) [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:10 pm
App. at 156-57, 662 S.E.2d at 94-95, where the challenged venire members were confused by misleading questions during voir dire and therefore did not require rehabilitation. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:54 am
Spruill, 765 S.E.2d 84 (North Carolina Court of Appeals 2014). [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 4:12 pm by Gregory Forman
“However, if you say you’re a lawyer, and if there’s a nexus between you being a lawyer and what you’re posting, then we’re going to come back to this rule and find it a ground for discipline,” contends Coggiola. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
We're warning you, if you're not a lawyer, then you'll find this post very boring. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:16 am by Samantha S. Erks, JD
Co., 208 N.C. 574, 576, 181 S.E. 635, 636 (1935). [3] In re Estate of Trogdon, 330 N.C. 143, 148, 409 S.E.2d 897, 900 (1991). [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 12:50 pm by Eve Ross
Fair, 209 S.C. 439, 40 S.E.2d 634 (1946) on Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/). [read post]