Search for: "In re Sanctions for Amato"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2022, 2:22 pm
So you can sanction the plaintiff and/or his counsel, or do other stuff to them, but you can't take away their right to a jury trial. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:52 am
"An order relieving a party from a default may be conditioned on payment of a monetary sanction pursuant to CPLR 5015(a) (see Gissaro v Lessne, 300 AD2d 281, 282; Du Jour v DeJean, 247 AD2d 370, 371; Workman v Amato, 231 AD2d 627, 628; Coven v Trust Co. of N.J., 225 AD2d 576; Sasson v Sasson, 134 AD2d 491). [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
These conversations are important, and they’re endlessly fascinating theoretically. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:03 am
”) (citation omitted); D’Amato v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am
"Financial Contracts and ‘Junk Bonds’ Purchases in the Italian Legal System: A Matter of (In)Correct Disclosure" Opinio Juris in Comparatione, Vol.1/2010, Paper No. 2 CRISTINA AMATO, University of BresciaEmail: amato@jus.unibs.itThe essay is concerned with the protection of investors against purchases of ‘junk bonds’. [read post]
