Search for: "In re Scott K. (1984)" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am by Kevin Kaufman
Scott Lincicome of the Cato Institute (an industrial policy critic) narrowed the term to four core aspects:[8] a focus on manufacturing, to the exclusion of services and agriculture; targeted and directed microeconomic (firm or industry‐​specific) support (e.g., tariffs or subsidies), as opposed to horizontal, sector‐​wide, or economy‐​wide policies (e.g., corporate tax rate reductions or patents); a government plan to fix market failures, including… [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 10:15 am by Mike Mireles
 The Commissioner of Trump's Food and Drug Administration, Scott Gottlieb, MD, recently released comments concerning pricing reform for a Brookings Institution discussion on pharmaceuticals. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm by Wolfgang Demino
ELEMENTS OF CAUSE OF ACTION FOR WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE  The elements of a wrongful foreclosure claim are: (1) a defect in the foreclosure sale proceedings; (2) an inadequate selling price; and (3) a causal connection between the defect and the inadequate selling price. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am by Christine Corcos
Wendy Hiller is the solicitor who gathers the clan together for the reading of Wilfred Hyde-White's will in a spooky house during a thunderstorm.Celebrity (TV miniseries, 1984). [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Wendy Hiller is the solicitor who gathers the clan together for the reading of Wilfred Hyde-White's will in a spooky house during a thunderstorm.Celebrity (TV miniseries, 1984). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
., 712 F.3d 60 (1st Cir. 2013) – all of which also travel under the heading, In re Neurontin Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 9:56 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
In another case, In re K-Dur, the 3d Cir. applied stricter antitrust scrutiny, holding that such settlements are subject to "quick look rule of reason analysis" that treats "any payment from a patent holder to a generic patent challenger who agrees to delay entry into the market as prima facie evidence of an unreasonable restraint of trade, which could be rebutted by showing that the payment (1) was for a purpose other than delayed entry or (2) offers some pro-competitive benefit."… [read post]