Search for: "In re Steven C." Results 1 - 20 of 996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2012, 7:04 am by John Steele
The misconduct caused a jury to render an illegal verdict, which in turn resulted in the loss of Senator Stevensre-election bid. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 2:31 pm by Javier Dominguez
Our weekly Leading the Way Q&A series features Podhurst Orseck partners Steven Marks and Peter Prieto. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:21 pm by David Bernstein
It makes me a bit uncomfortable, however, that (a) the conference is styled “The Finest Legal Mind”: A Symposium in Celebration of Justice John Paul Stevens; (b) the conference is stacked with former Stevens clerks, and former clerks rarely criticize their Justices in public; and (c) also consistent with the celebration theme, I don’t see any speaker listed who is likely be critical of the ideological thrust of Justice Stevens’s… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:37 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
By the time the 15 minute tour was completed Roberts brought Kagan back to the robbing room and Stevens’ nameplate had been replaced with her own.ADDED: From the same interview (which will be on C-SPAN this Sunday): AND: Meade points out the misspelling in the quote above: "robbing room. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:26 am by Michael Geist
In a day that started with Canadian Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault urging the Senate to focus on passing Bill C-10, Senators from across the political spectrum again signalled that they believe that Guilbeault’s bill requires extensive hearings given the flawed legislative approach in the House of Commons and a resulting bill that raises a wide range of policy concerns. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 6:32 am by Michael Geist
First,  opposition MPs from all parties have also re-introduced their amendments. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 6:10 am by Michael Geist
Perhaps the most interesting vote of the night came with a motion from Conservative MP Alain Rayes, which once again called for the re-insertion of Section 4.1. [read post]