Search for: "In re Sullivan"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2019, 4:46 am
Either you’re teaching law or you’re indulging their feelings. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:04 am
This post is based on a Sullivan & Cromwell memorandum by Mr. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 5:50 am
The so-called first sale doctrine [17 U.S.C. sec. 109(a)] protects "lawfully made" copies, but Judge Sullivan said the doctrine applies only to sales "by the owner of a particular copy...of that copy." [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 6:00 pm
Partner departures are more common farther down the Am Law 100, but they're rare at a place like Sullivan & Cromwell. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 6:00 pm
Partner departures are more common farther down the Am Law 100, but they're rare at a place like Sullivan & Cromwell. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 6:05 pm
That means they're starting to get the work that contract attorneys usually get. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
Read Exhibit C to the Charney Complaint (PDF) re: Kodak's complaints regarding fees and overstaffing. [read post]
13 May 2019, 10:41 am
And let's dispense with some of the nonsense.Yes, Harvard has a right to ask Dean Sullivan to step down. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:24 pm
We love the homosexuals, but we do not condone what they’re doing." [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:46 pm
Sullivan, maybe no one will notice? [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:36 pm
We're not very good at math. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:12 pm
Now we're up to the juiciest part -- Paragraph 19. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 5:17 am
I'm sure Mary Sullivan has had a positive influence on her athletes. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 10:09 am
Sullivan & Cromwell. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:05 am
From a blast email we received yesterday from Sullivan & Cromwell (yes, we're on the S&C distribution list): Please note Sullivan & Cromwell LLP's representation of Microsoft (U.S.) in its proposed US$ 44.6 billion acquisition of Yahoo! [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:30 pm
We’re not going away, but they will unless they can find some way of accommodating us. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:36 pm
Sullivan & Cromwell (scroll down) [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 10:26 am
If you shock and disgust Sullivan, you're probably pretty darn shocking and disgusting. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 5:34 am
How can you say genitalia is irrelevant when what you're talking about is something you do with your genitalia? [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 8:27 am
But since, in our hypothetical, you’re a British immigrant, and a former editor of the New Republic, who happens to write the most influential blog that there is, and since many powerful people in law and politics read and follow your work, the United States Attorney will dismiss all charges against you. [read post]
