Search for: "In re Supreme Court Committee on Automation"
Results 41 - 60
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2009, 12:33 am
Supreme Court decision five months ago that tightened the recusal requirements for elected state judges. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
As for another example, some have observed that organizations relying on AI for advanced data analytics or consequential decisions may not necessarily know ahead of time how the information processed by AI systems will be used or what insights they will discover.Footnote4 This has led some to call into question the practicality of the purpose specification principle, that requires on the one hand “specifying purposes” to individuals at the time of collecting their information and, on the… [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
As for another example, some have observed that organizations relying on AI for advanced data analytics or consequential decisions may not necessarily know ahead of time how the information processed by AI systems will be used or what insights they will discover.Footnote4 This has led some to call into question the practicality of the purpose specification principle, that requires on the one hand “specifying purposes” to individuals at the time of collecting their information and, on the… [read post]
16 May 2011, 2:37 pm
Instead, Roark drew the wrath of Hayden who pleaded with her to stop agitating against the program and seemed to suggest to Roark he had assurances that the Supreme Court would back the program. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Court, D. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
In a move aimed at limiting agencies’ rulemaking power, the House Judiciary Committee passed the Separation of Powers Restoration Act, a law that would overrule the Supreme Court’s 1984 Chevron decision that established deference to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes, and would instead require courts to review all legal questions de novo—Rep. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 12:09 am
Supreme Court, a quest that has repeatedly fallen on deaf ears at the high court. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:36 pm
The only court that provides its own judgments here is the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
The more recent EARN IT draft, which passed out of committee on July 2, is, in a way, worse. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 8:16 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
- Cassation Court’s criminal chamber orders destruction of 3,123 Abode of Chaos works of art – copyright questions (1709 Copyright Blog) Germany Federal Supreme Court: incidental introduction of new document and due process in opposition proceedings (EPLAW) Federal Supreme Court: Prior use right and contractual arrangements between inventor and alleged infringer (EPLAW) Hong Kong Giorgio Armani not amused by Giormani of Hong Kong… [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
(If you’re not interested in the more US-specific discussion, I suggest starting a few paragraphs into Question 10.) [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court supporting New Jersey’s attempt to overturn the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), which keeps states from authorizing sports betting. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
In Florida, a committee appointed by the state Supreme Court approved “in concept” changes that would create a Law Practice Innovation Laboratory Program similar to Utah’s regulatory sandbox and that would allow some loosening of the rules around nonlawyer ownership of law firms. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
In Florida, a committee appointed by the state Supreme Court approved “in concept” changes that would create a Law Practice Innovation Laboratory Program similar to Utah’s regulatory sandbox and that would allow some loosening of the rules around nonlawyer ownership of law firms. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Supreme Court battle. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 8:03 am
As the Supreme Court has recognized, the “guarantee of free speech does not extend only to categories of speech that survive an ad hoc balancing of relative social costs and benefits. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 1:00 pm
Joining them in support of the legislation were the state’s two top judges, Texas Supreme Court Justice Nathan Hecht – who has publicly called for a change to Texas’ system for years – and Court of Appeals Presiding Judge Sharon Keller. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
