Search for: "In re Supreme Court Committee on Child Support"
Results 221 - 240
of 302
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2011, 11:16 am
KSM is the poster child for the terrorist who could and should (long ago) have been prosecuted in federal criminal court. [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:20 am
KSM is the poster child for the terrorist who could and should (long ago) have been prosecuted in federal criminal court. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
In this regard, Para 3.4 (v) of the said Manual reads as follows:"(v) In cases of alleged sex offences such as intercourse with a female child, forcible rape, indecent liberties or perversion, it is important that the victim, as well as the accused, be made available for interview and polygraph examination. [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:05 am
In addition, the Supreme Court has observed that the “value of nurturing and sustaining sibling relationships” cannot be underestimated. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 12:45 am
The committee process did provide some valuable information - confirmation of the effectiveness of the notice-and-notice system, the broad support for a digital lock exception for non-infringing purposes (including consumer groups, education, libraries, retailers, and telecom companies), and the value of codifying the Supreme Court of Canada's fair dealing test into the Copyright Act to address uncertainty concerns. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:03 am
The scope of legal aid must not be crudely chopped but re-drawn in such a way as to ensure that vulnerable individuals continue to be protected. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court was unanimous on the point. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
If a party wanted the court to adopt the exception, it appears that an argument similar to the one adopted in the California Court of Appeals case, In re Santos Y.[22] could be used. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
It is unlikely that Iowa would probably accept that argument, however, based upon the decisions of the North Dakota Supreme Court in the case of In the Interest of A.B.[23] and the Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of In the Matter of Baby Boy L.[24]. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:31 am
PBS NewsHourListen to the AudioThe Supreme Court heard arguments on whether California can ban the sale of violent video games to minors. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:25 am
They're all on the table. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:26 am
Currently on the North Carolina trial bench, Diaz has awaited a vote since getting the unanimous support of the Senate Judiciary Committee in January. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:10 pm
" Not only are Henry's name and addresses – including that of his employer – now listed on the wildly expanding Texas sex offender registry, but even though New Jersey considered his offense a low-level misdemeanor, under Texas law the charge is considered a felony offense of "indecency with a child. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:02 pm
In re Guardianship of Doe, No. 28139, Oct. 31, 2008. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:27 am
While the Supreme Court has held that a parent may “bind a minor child to arbitrate future tort claims,” Hojnowski v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 1:45 pm
Recktenwald to be the next Chief Justice of the Hawaii Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 533 N.E.2d 748 (Ohio 1988) (the Ohio Supreme Court rejecting the theory). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Finding it would serve no public purpose, the master recommended that none be re-tried.[13] That meant 4,500 cases of children appearing in that court from 2003 to 2008.[14] On October 29, 2009, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:41 am
” Id. at 125 (quoting Supreme Court’s Judiciary-Surrogates Liaison Committee, Guidelines for Court-Appointed Attorneys in Incompetency Matters, 1 (1995)). [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:59 am
With only a few weeks left in this work period, before August recess--and with a heated mid-term election cycle on the horizon--the Senate will wrangle with, among other priorities, a Supreme Court nomination, wall street reform, climate change, jobless benefits, and child nutrition reauthorization. [read post]
