Search for: "In re Supreme Court Committee on Child Support" Results 61 - 80 of 175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Part II will assess how the court marshals the Supreme Court’s precedents concerning reviewability of immigration decisions and the Establishment Clause. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:28 am by SHG
Sources further say that the Supreme Court notified Mr. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:12 am by Lawyerist
Then before too long I went back and taught at the University of Michigan law school in the Child Advocacy Law Clinic doing child welfare cases, and working with students. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:12 am by Lawyerist
Aaron Street: Today’s interview about work life balance and parent friendly law firms and things reminded me of a case that is currently headed to the Minnesota state supreme court. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
When the Supreme Court upheld the Indian Act’s discriminatory provisions on Indian status for women, Sandra Lovelace took her case before the UN Human Rights Committee, whi [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Meanwhile the under pressure Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport, hard on the heels of her unconvincing performance at the DCMS Committee announced a “consultation” on Leveson Part 2 and the bringing into force of Section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:07 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
NSR sounds like a staffer on the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs c. 1965 before the [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm by familoo
We have seen the Northern Irish Supreme Court Justice Lord Kerr suggesting that Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ought to be directly applicable, and the Supreme Court applying it in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47 (8 July 2015). [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Transparency project discusses the Re X judgment and the issue of transparency versus confidentiality. [read post]
In In Re Coe No. 01-2488-D, 7/16/03, the Wisconsin Supreme Court admonished lawyer Coe for being sarcastic and disrespectful toward the disciplinary referee. [read post]
In In Re Coe No. 01-2488-D, 7/16/03, the Wisconsin Supreme Court admonished lawyer Coe for being sarcastic and disrespectful toward the disciplinary referee. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
On one Sunday each month we bring you a summary from Supreme Advocacy LLP of recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:12 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Supreme Court decisions bar courts from jailing people simply because they are too poor to pay their fines. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 7:00 am by Natasha Gálvez
I came back to work part-time after the birth of my first child, and I became an example of how to make part-time work. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 7:00 am by Natasha Gálvez
I came back to work part-time after the birth of my first child, and I became an example of how to make part-time work. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:52 am by Ken Chasse
An equally important reason for creating a much more sophisticated and competent legal research facility for the legal profession, is the need of the courts, particularly the Supreme Court of Canada and the provincial and territorial Courts of Appeal. [read post]