Search for: "In re Swindall" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2013, 3:27 am
”  As I explained in an earlier post, the premise of Rule 404(a) is that one party in a case ne side should not be able to show you did some bad things in that past and then use the evidence of those “bad acts” to claim you’re a bad person who continues to do bad things. [read post]