Search for: "In re TM"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
Why does that happen when we’re expanding the concept of confusion in other ways? [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Is confusion what we’re testing for in those cases anyway? [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Students who thought Louboutin should win: they’re using the contrasting outsoles to evaluate quality of shoe. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
What are the legitimate interests protected by TM? [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
So we’re close to having this doctrine but courts won’t yet take the final step. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
A lot of times law pretends to talk about distinctiveness of but is really concerned with distinctivenss from.Jake Linford: What do we think we’re doing w/TM law? [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 11:16 pm
In In re Apple & AT&TM Antitrust Litigation, No. 07-CV-05152-JW (N.D. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Well-known marks: Transitional cases: we’re in the middle of a change in the law—making exceptions to territoriality. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 2:56 am
Try this.Why granting TM protection to hashtags is bad. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 8:02 am
TM LUTAS MAKES A PREDICTION: Out of the 18 Iraqi provinces, 3 kurdish ones have their greatest security threats being foreign incursion from Turkey and Iran. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 9:01 am
ECHR says TM applications are "property"Hot off the press, via Lovells' trade mark expert and scholar Burkhart Goebel, is news that the European Court of Human Rights has today done the right and proper thing. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 2:20 pm
You’re supposed to examine the mark, not the commercial use of the mark. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 11:01 am
They don’t improve reputation so much as marginalize on it—you’re no longer relying on past encounters. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
Two kinds implicated: secondary meaning surveys are among the worst in TM law. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
ECJ tends to say that when you’re assessing whether something is devoid of distinctive character/unregistrable, you use the POV of the consumer, and descriptive things ar [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
If we’re going to engage with boundaries, we should also engage with the instincts courts have about copying. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:21 am
They’re much more uncomfortable with having fun. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
Nobody every adopted a TM because it was ugly; TMs are inherently attractive. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
This year, we're demonstrating our patent-pending Smart Referrals(tm) technology. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
They’re talking about things they care about and wish they could protect—so what is law? [read post]
