Search for: "In re TM"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Something to do with whether consumers will blame the right person if they’re unhappy. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:03 pm
The Internet TM. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:25 am
DonâEUR(TM)t [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 10:24 am
We’re saying that this has made us overlook the effects of TM on innovation, which could be good or bad. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
They’re not about source confusion. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 12:20 am
A reasoned response (here) clarified that the TM is valid only in the U.S., so no rights in East Africa are involved, and further argued that this is normal business behaviour and normal use of the TM system. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 11:32 am
I feel that this limit on prior art makes sense if and only if we are confining design patents to truly ornamental designs—once we’re getting to even semi-functional designs, prior art on attaching things to one another seems relevant. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
[Although these are presumptions about how consumers will think, so we’re not just expecting, we’re hypothesizing and holding as a matter of law.] [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:29 am
Judge Reyna's dissent makes a point that I think courts will find very hard to grapple with, whatever the fate of 2(a) or disparagement specifically: Judge Dyk concurs in the result today only because he believes the content of Mr. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:59 am
Our friends over at the World Trademark Review have recently launched what they’re calling the first blog by specialized IP journalists. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 9:40 am
Our reply to that explanation is you’re being too clever by half. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Conflict b/t TM logic and unfair competition law: German SCt decided that TM logic prevailed and that TM logic needs to be taken into account in unfair competition analysis, even though Directive does not have exceptions or provisions for balancing competing interests. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
But chances are that they're also using a search engine like Google (TM) to find out other information about you. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:59 pm
If we’re running out of TMs, that’s a fixed stock that could go away. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
” In practice, many of the gripe cases say they are following First Amendment precedents, only when they’re confronted by a subset of noncommercial speech—that which does not solicit the purchase of the speech itself. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:59 am
Courts don’t think they’re doing search costs so they won’t be responsive to those arguments. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
So we get the idea that we’re concerned w/TMs as they exist in the market, and we need to be skeptical about any rule that sees registration as a thing in itself. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:13 pm
If you’re wrong, they will mock you or just ignore you. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm
TM law says that if people think both would produce, then they’re in the same market. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:47 am
Sari Mazzuco: Sounds like you’re talking about dignitary/personality harms—that’s not something TM necessarily cares about especially if family has no intent to reenter the market. [read post]
