Search for: "In re The Walt Disney Company Derivative Litigation"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2022, 4:45 pm
Here is the abstract: In re The Walt Disney Co. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 5:00 am
In In re the Walt Disney Co. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:18 am
In In re Walt Disney Co. [read post]
31 May 2016, 9:00 am
While the prohibition against self-interested transactions by the board is the most fundamental obligation under the duty of loyalty, the good-faith corollary to the duty of loyalty under In re The Walt Disney Derivative Litigation, 907 A.2d 693, 754-55 (Del. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 10:31 am
In re The Walt Disney Company Derivative Litigation is a long-running and closely-watched case that raises many significant questions concerning the role of law in connection with the governance of large public corporations. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 10:32 am
" In re Walt Disney Co. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:04 pm
” In re Walt Disney Co. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:47 am
See In re The Boeing Company Derivative Litigation, 2021 WL 4059934 (Del. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 5:15 am
" In re Walt Disney Co. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
Derivative Litig., 906 A.2d 27, 64 (Del. 2006), “but also intentional dereliction of duty. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:47 pm
Derivative Litig., 906 A.2d 27, 64 (Del. 2006), "but also intentional dereliction of duty. [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:32 am
The test for bad faith action laid down in In re the Walt Disney Company Derivative Litigation, 906 A.2d 27 (Del. 2006), is intentional dereliction of duties or a conscious disregard of one's responsibilities. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 7:52 am
In June 2006 the court, in In re The Walt Disney Company Derivative Litigation (New Developments discussion here), defined bad faith, and by implication good faith. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
See In re Walt Disney, 731 A.2d 342 (Del. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:08 pm
The former duty requires a director to take an active and direct role in the context of a sale of a company from beginning to end. [22] Disney Lastly, a $140 million executive compensation and severance package of former Walt Disney Company President Michael Ovitz was the basis for the breach of fiduciary duty suit against Disney's officers and directors. [23] Shortly after Ovitz joined Disney, it became apparent that there… [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 1:20 pm
See, In re Walt Disney Co. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
During the periods relevant to the litigation, Mr. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 2:31 pm
In re Walt Disney Co. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:35 pm
For example, the Delaware Supreme Court's 2005 opinion in In re The Walt Disney Co. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 6:10 am
[xii] Id. at *5 (quoting In re Walt Disney Co. [read post]
