Search for: "In re The Williams Companies, Inc. Stockholder Litigation" Results 41 - 52 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2017, 1:07 pm by Francis Pileggi
The court cited the recent Delaware Supreme Court decision of In re Cornerstone Therapeutics, Inc., Stockholder Litigation, 115 A.3d 1173, 1175 – 76 (Del. 2015), for the proposition that whether Revlon or Unocal or the entire business standard or the Business Judgment Rule applies, a plaintiff seeking only monetary damages must still plead non-exculpated claims against the director who is protected by an exculpatory charter provision to survive a motion to… [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:20 pm
there would be no real obstacle to the Bancroft entities getting a premium.As "Steve" notes, the chief problem case is In re Tele-Communications, Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:46 am by Tracy Coenen
  It’s basically when a big company tries to shut up a little guy with expensive litigation. [read post]
The Delaware Chancery Court recently issued a resounding affirmation of the business judgment rule in the case In re the Dow Chemical Company Derivative Litigation. [1] Directors can take comfort in this timely reminder that, despite challenging economic circumstances and an environment of heightened scrutiny of boards and individual directors, the protections of the business judgment rule remain robust in Delaware. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
(Editor’s Note: This post comes to us from Katrina Dewey, CEO & Publisher, Lawdragon, Inc.) [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
 Of course, if the Obama Administration intends to request Senate confirmation of Hesse and William J. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:40 pm by Sam E. Antar
Mulacek so much that a certain company he controls filed a bad-faith bankruptcy in an apparent attempt to derail litigation set for trial this May. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Clerking for Stapleton remains a significant credential in Delaware; William T. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
In December 2010, the JG Controlling Member brought suit in JG's name (read complaint here) against Jacaranda, its principal, Michael Talla, and a separate company controlled by Talla called Club at 60th St., Inc. ("60th St.") from which Sapphire leased its club facility, asserting a number of individual and derivative claims on Sapphire's behalf. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
In December 2010, the JG Controlling Member brought suit in JG's name (read complaint here) against Jacaranda, its principal, Michael Talla, and a separate company controlled by Talla called Club at 60th St., Inc. [read post]