Search for: "In re Thomas C. (1986)"
Results 101 - 112
of 112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
The court concluded that, even if ABC did discriminate based on race (which ABC had denied, id. at 996), it had a right to do so: [C]asting decisions are a necessary component of any entertainment show's creative content. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
The proposal to use electricity provoked legal wrangles between the Edison and Westinghouse companies which promoted, respectively, direct and alternating current.Following the first electrocution in 1890, Dr Alfred Southwick, the chair of the commission which recommended the electric chair, was reported as saying that "we live in a higher civilisation from this day"(5) though Thomas Edison reportedly "rebuked the doctors and said it was a mistake to have let them handle the… [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Observes Equitable Estoppel Requires Close Scrutiny of Child.In re K.G., v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Observes Equitable Estoppel Requires Close Scrutiny of Child.In re K.G., v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
The Friedrich court was referring to In Re Bates, High Court of Justice, Family Division, Royal Courts of London, No. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Since 1986, seven public commissions of inquiry have been held in Canada following cases of confirmed wrongful convictions. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
We’re releasing these as we get ready to submit a big filing in the FCC’s “Future of Media” proceeding (deadline is May 7th). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
Thomas Godley & Grimes, PLLC, by Maren Tallent Werts and Seth A. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
“Five for fighting” – The National Hockey League’s Liability for Fighting and Enforcers As the season changes to winter, many Canadians turn their attention to the national pastime: hockey. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
[Doomsday warnings don't hold up] The debate over carrying firearms outside the home often is accompanied by predictions that public carry will lead to more violent crime. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
