Search for: "In re Witham"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 1:35 am
In re Frontsouth (Witham) Ltd (in administration) and Bridge Hospital (Witham) Ltd (in administration) [2011] EWHC 1668 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 215 “Rule 7.55 of the Insolvency Rules 1986 could not be used by the court to waive defects of a relatively technical nature in the out of court appointment of administrators and such a change should only be brought about by legislation. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 3:07 pm
Witham a little bit. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:51 pm
But despite having been the target of death threats stemming from his work in security, Sheriff John McGinness saw to it that Witham's license to carry a gun while away from work was revoked upon Witham's relocation to Sacramento. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
“We’re not out to treat people as school kids, but we do expect if you come to court, you need to treat it with the appropriate respect and dignity it should deserve due to the occasion,” says Delaware Superior Court Judge William Witham Jr. ... [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:20 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Pryor v Greater Manchester Police [2011] EWCA Civ 749 (30 June 2011) Clark v Bourne Leisure Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 753 (30 June 2011) Mahan Air & Anor v Blue Sky One Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 771 (01 July 2011) Grant v HM Land Registry [2011] EWCA Civ 769 (01 July 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Flinders, R (on the application of) v The Director of High Security & Ors [2011] EWHC 1630 (Admin) (30 June 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Cordoba… [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 8:45 am
In re Guardianship of S.H. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 8:45 am
In re Guardianship of S.H. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In R v Lord Chancellor Ex p Witham[1998] QB 575 he noted (at 581) that “in the unwritten legal order of the British state” it is “the common law [which] continues to accord a legislative supremacy to Parliament”. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group v Print Week, Clauses 1, 2, 14/08/2012; Teresa Kendal v Braintree… [read post]
