Search for: "In re York fn. 3" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The court says that either New York or California law governs, and the result would be the same under either state’s law. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Advocates of New York's restrictive carry regime say that it saves lives. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
SODRAC 2003 Inc., 2015 SCC 57 (CanLII), [2015] 3 SCR 615, <https://canlii.ca/t/gm8b0> (“CBC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 9:34 am by Howard Knopf
 Maître Audet, the Board’s General Counsel, noted some possible questions arising from the pending SCC York University v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 11:30 am by Beth S. Lyons
So, when I became a lawyer and started at Legal Aid in New York City, there was no question as to which side I would represent. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 7:17 am by Eric Goldman
” * In re Bitconnect Securities Litigation, 2019 WL 9104318 (S.D. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 4:20 pm by Josh Blackman
Panetta relied on New York Rule of Professional Conduct that mirrors 3.5(c)(3) almost verbatim: it refers to "misrepresentation, coercion, duress or harassment. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
He seemed to go right at the intended target individual to offer his hope for the future of mankind, his definition of a way of coming to power, to peace, and to a better tomorrow for all his people, indeed for all mankind.[3] In speaking to larger groups, the Peacemaker spoke more bluntly and simply. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 7:26 am by Juan C. Antúnez
August 16, 2016) If you’re a trusts and estates litigator in Florida, sooner or later you’re going to be involved in some kind of multi-jurisdictional case. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
It's been almost a year since my last series of posts on the fallout from Hobby Lobby--in particular, on the challenges by nonprofit organizations to the government's augmented religious accommodation. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm by Carrie Cordero
The Executive Branch has “made determinations to not pursue surveillance on dozens of heads of state and government,” according to a senior administration official.[2] In March 2014, the President announced specific changes that he directed be implemented immediately regarding the telephone metadata program.[3] Specifically, he informed the public that the metadata dataset would only be queried using two “hops” from the original “seed” telephone number;… [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Charles Kotuby
See, e.g, In re Eli Lilly & Co., No. 3:09MC296 (AWT), 2010 WL 2509133, at *4 (D. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm by Gretchen Goetz
” wrote one FSIS meat inspector to a colleague March 3, in response to a consumer inquiry. [read post]