Search for: "In re contested case hearing re conservation district use application " Results 41 - 52 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2016, 8:30 am by MBettman
In re M.D., 38 Ohio St.3d 149 (1988) (The Supreme Court of Ohio will consider constitutional challenges to the application of statutes despite clear waiver in specific cases of plain error or where the rights and interests involved my warrant it.) [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and de-branding of… [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 6:56 pm by Ken
(That fiction is particularly ridiculous in cases like this, where a probation officer in one district would be seeking a warrant from a judge in another di [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 7:29 pm
Apparently, he would sit down with the court reporter after the trials, which happened to be a woman he knew personally, and re-wrote what they thought was relevant from the trial hearings. [read post]
27 May 2009, 9:32 am by Robert Bennett
Apparently, he would sit down with the court reporter after the trials, which happened to be a woman he knew personally, and re-wrote what they thought was relevant from the trial hearings. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Back in 2015, as I discussed and analyzed at length both here at Dorf on Law and subsequently in an article in the UCLA Law Review Discourse, Republican state elected officials successfully steered a lawsuit to Hanen—the only active judge hearing cases in his south Texas judicial division, and one with an extensive, well-documented record of anti-immigrant hostility—to challenge the legality of the Obama administration’s 2014 efforts to expand… [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am by Amy Howe
In one case, Breyer agreed with the court’s conservative wing to uphold the display; in the other, he sided with the court’s liberals to strike down the display. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am by MOTP
In four issues on appeal, appellants assert the trial court erred in finding breach of contract, enforcing a liquidated damages clause, applying prejudgment interest, and granting an unsegregated, contested attorney's fee application. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am by Steven M. Taber
The case against ‘99¢ Only Stores’ concerned the sale of three cleaning and pest control products. [read post]