Search for: "In re the Dependency of A.P."
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2016, 5:04 am
The answer to that question seems to depend on whether it's obvious who is helped and who is hurt. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:10 pm
(b)(1)), alleging Father and A.P. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:36 am
A.P. 07-4106 (May 28, 2008). [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 1:06 am
by Jakob Plesner Mathiasen and Thit Nymand NisbethImagine you’re sitting in a movie theater, eagerly awaiting the next blockbuster action film to begin. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:37 am
A.P.: I suppose your thinking is that it is suffering and sin that make this world less than perfect. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:50 am
State of A.P. reported at 2008 (17) SCC 225, one of us, has referred to and quoted with approval the general principles while dealing with an appeal against acquittal, wherein, it was clearly mentioned that; the appellate court has full power to review, relook and re-appreciate the entire evidence based on which the order of acquittal is founded; further it was also accepted that the Code of Criminal Procedure puts no limitation or restriction on the appellate court to reach its… [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:31 am
From In re Hill (City National Bank v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
Despite this limited motive, the virus spread to businesses around the world, causing significant collateral damage to many other organizations, including the law firm DLA Piper and the Danish conglomerate A.P. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
The application of the doctrine depends on the nature of the appellate or revisional order in each case and the scope of the statutory provisions conferring the appellate or revisional jurisdiction.In M/s Gojer Brothers Pvt.Ltd. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
Noting that the exclusion applies to “tangible personal property,” and the sales tax regulation interpreting the exclusion provides that whether materials are further processed or simply used in the processing activity will depend entirely upon an analysis of the “end product,” the court reasoned that it found nothing in the law that requires the “end product” be the enterprise’s primary product, explaining: “The plain language of the… [read post]
