Search for: "In re the Interest of J. R." Results 1 - 20 of 2,801
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2019, 12:30 am
US representatives) may be held responsible for taking the necessary care (J 4/07).The appeal in J 05/18 related to a decision by the Examining Division to re-establish an application (EP12152933.3) following a failure to meet a further processing deadline (Article 121 EPC). [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
Rather, it only corresponds to the due care that is required in the applicant’s own interest and reflects the concrete circumstances. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:08 pm
By not doing so, it has violated its duty of clarification (Aufklärungspflicht). [10]The Board then discusses decisions J 15/92 (where re-establishment was granted on the basis of the principle of good faith), J 34/92, J 6/90, and J 6/98 (where re-establishment was refused on the basis of legal security). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The Board therefore prefers to approach the question applying more general principles, as set out below.Stay of proceedings: the general principles.[5.1] The purpose of R 14(1) is to protect the third party’s interests during entitlement proceedings, at least provisionally (J 7/96 [2.3]; J 15/06 [7]; J 20/05 [3]).[5.2] Whether or not the recording of a transfer literally constitutes part of the “proceedings for grant” (and thus… [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:09 am
A recent decision of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court has an interesting observation in this regard. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:42 pm
Surrogate Elliott, however, went one step further by awarding statutory (9%) interest on the surcharge against the fiduciary. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
In Merritt Estate, Smily J. commented, at para. 4, that “it is well established that [the rate of interest] should be the legal rate, which is 5%. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:39 am by Simon Chester
Neil, and re-affirmed in Strother v. 3464920 Canada Inc. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am by David Pocklington
With regard to “sufficient interest” of campaigning groups or individuals, in their written submissions the petitioners made reference to the considerations by the Administrative Court (Macur LJ, Chamberlain J) in R (McCourt) v Parole Board for England and Wales [2020] EWHC 2320 (Admin). [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
As can be seen from the basic proposition for a revision of the EPC of October 13, 2000 (MR/2/00, Number 6, A 122), the lawmaker wanted to keep the possibility of re-establishment into the time limit for further processing, which had been acknowledged by the case law (J 12/92 [3.2.2]; J 29/94 [3], J 902/87 [2.2-4]). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Hence, the applicant cannot derive any claims if this communication is either not sent (see J 12/84) or not sent to the correct addressee. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 2:44 pm by Aviation LawProf
Blog reader's interested in China's growing aviation sector may be interested to read Qiang Gong & Xingli Fan's The Neutrality of Fuel Surcharge, 1 Global J. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 3:32 am by Giorgio Buono
Paul Lagarde (Univ. of Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne): Les règlements en matière de régimes matrimoniaux et d’effets patrimoniaux des partenariats enregistrés; Prof. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:13 am
The right at issue is the banks' security interest, the court wrote, and nothing in the Addendum violates this. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 9:04 am
The event is designed to foster maximum inclusivity, both regarding the approaches studied as well as re-garding the method(ologie)s used to study these phenomena.Please submit expressions of interest to IGILTP’s chair, Jörg Kammerhofer (joerg.kammerhofer@jura-uni.freiburg.de), until Wednesday, 31 January 2018. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 7:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Others described R&J’s staff as unprofessional and rude; the service as expensive; and claimed that a test performed by R&J “burned” skin. [read post]