Search for: "In re the Marriage of Cardona and Castro"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2014, 12:49 pm
., expressly prohibits the Commission from nonetheless regulating them as such; and because the Commission has failed to establish that the anti-discrimination and anti-blocking rules did not impose per se common carrier obligations, the court vacated those portions of the Open Internet Order.Read More: Rebuffing F.C.C. in ‘Net Neutrality’ Case, Court Allows Streaming DealsIn re the Marriage of Cardona and Castro, Colorado Supreme Court (1/13/14)Family… [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm
” Specifically, Blount argued that this time was not “vested” because another Colorado Supreme Court decision—In Re Marriage of Cardona & Castro—had effectively held that vacation time never vests unless a policy providing for it permits an employee to receive money in lieu of unused vacation time. [read post]
