Search for: "In re the Marriage of Lyon"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2011, 9:14 am
Hopefully they’re powerful enough to overcome the bigotry.Fifty power gays, and we’re very close to gay marriage in New York. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 12:04 pm
"They're just not in the nurturing mode any more. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Lyons, however, personal enforcement history in itself isn't relevant to the availability of prospective relief. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 6:13 pm
My grandparents' marriage is not unlike Martin and Lyon's. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 10:49 am
c) The confirmation of the crime of forced marriage is jurisdictionally defective because it is not found in the Statute and there is no specificity as to the legal element of mens rea, nor is there a specific link to Mr Ongwen. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 8:39 am
Alright, I know what you’re thinking. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 6:20 am
” Lyons v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:27 am
"Arbor Civilis" in Institutiones (Lyon: 1513) For anyone who was not able to attend this presentation, you are in luck. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 9:28 am
It also means that when AALL Government Relations Office Director Mary Alice Baish goes before Congress to explain why GPO really needs the funding they're asking for, that message is backed by the full force of an active and engaged association. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 7:08 am
"[T]he court made no distinction between what needs were reasonable, given the age of the children, and what simply amounted to a 'fourth pony,'" wrote Parker, who was joined by Judges Rudy Coleman and Thomas Lyons. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES -- GUARDIANSHIP. [read post]
10 May 2022, 12:21 pm
[i] If there are children outside of the marriage, then those children are usually entitled to another portion of the assets. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The case concerned an article published by The Times on 21 November 2022 titled Law chiefs rule against college head in gay row, which falsely claimed that Ms Rose had wrongly claimed she was professionally obliged to take on a same-sex marriage case in the Cayman Islands and had acted recklessly. [read post]
