Search for: "In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. V. and S. V., Parents"
Results 1 - 20
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2012, 9:52 am
Thus, a relationship between a child and parent should be curtailed by the court only when in the child’s best interests and not as a means to punish a parent or coerce a parent’s compliance with a court order. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
(g) Failure to protect the child from conditions within his environment injurious to the child’s welfare. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Governor Greg Abbott’s recent directive ordering the child welfare agency to investigate all gender-affirming care for trans children as child abuse is a particularly cruel example of this.A trial court in Texas has issued a temporary restraining order that prevents Abbott and his lackeys from acting on the order (Doe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:44 am
” Comment Two further cases ML and AR v RWB and SWB (2012) Fam Law 13 and Re P and L (2011) EWHC 343 1, the judgments of which post-date this appeal, attempted to lay down some guidance when dealing with cases which concern children born to two female parents and a known male parent. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 3:47 am
Re S (Parental Alienation: Cult) [2020] In Re S, the child was born in 2011 and her parents split before her first birthday. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
(g) Failure to protect the child from conditions within his environment injurious to the child’s welfare. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 2:52 am
S appealed against this decision and on 17th March his appeal was allowed – Re S (A Child) [2010] EWCA Civ 325. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
She stated (at paragraph 144) that Payne: "identifies a number of factors which will or may be relevant in a relocation case, explains their importance to the welfare of the child, and suggests helpful disciplines to ensure that the proper matters are considered in reaching a decision but it does not dictate the outcome of a case". [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Mississippi originally adopted the existing Indian family doctrine in Matter of B.B.[25], but the case’s jurisdiction was postponed by Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:17 am
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Application of)|In re J.Y. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:17 am
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Application of)|In re J.Y. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:30 am
As the Supreme Court of California stated in In re Nicolas H. and again in Elisa B., what drives these presumptions is the state’s concern for the child’s welfare and its interest in preserving the integrity of the family. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Court Upholds Removal of Child From Parents, Related to Child's Transgender Identity
21 Oct 2022, 3:45 pm
The FCM explained that it "was not a matter of who's right or who's wrong […], it's just more of a matter of ensuring [Child's] safety. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Re E can be seen in some ways as guiding interpretation of Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention ‘back on track’, following the decision of the ECHR last year in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland [2011] 1 FLR 122. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:00 pm
”); Matter of C.H., 997 P.2d 776 (Mont. 2000) (similar); and Matter of S.E.G., 521 N.W.2d 357 (Minn. 1994) (similar); see also Michael J. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
D.C. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am
This case has been shadowed by concerns about Indian authenticity, equal protection, fatherhood and motherhood, dysfunctional child welfare systems, and “deserving” adoptive parents. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 2:33 am
[In re J. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
We do not think it can fairly be argued that Lieven J’s conclusion, in the unusual circumstances of this case, was wrong. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 9:05 am
Fall & Curtis J. [read post]
