Search for: "In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. V. and S. V., Parents"
Results 61 - 74
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2007, 7:23 am
J. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Ultimately, by the 19th century, the slow, relatively stable and case based structures of common law/equity started to experience substantial stress in the face of the Enlightenment’s emphasis on the science of management (of people and things) and the realities of the Industrial Revolution. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
It is well settled that the paramount concern in a custody proceeding arising out of a parental dispute is "the best interest of the child[ren], and what will best promote the child[ren's] welfare and happiness" (Eschbach v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Major decision making with respect to the children’s health, education, and welfare would usually be made by the mother as the primary caregiving parent. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:57 am
” In re Mitchell W., supra (quoting In re Frank V., 233 Cal. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
The master characterized the atmosphere in Judge Ciavarella’s court as casting such a “pall” over the functioning of that court, its integrity was subverted, and recommended that each and every adjudication of a child in that court be vacated.[12] The recommendation included every child, whether having the benefit of counsel or not, and every child, whether or not sent to PA Child Care, or anywhere for that matter. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:19 am
"] From C.M. v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
Respondent on April 12, 1994 filed a motion returnable April 27, 1994 seeking re-argument of the dispositional order dated April 7, 1994. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:36 am
From C.M. v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
In Appleton, Mostyn conceded he might have gone a bit far there, and of course the Re S balancing exercise would still need to be carried out (see Re S (A Child) [2004] UKHL 47, which sets out the exercise judges must carry out to decide issues that engage competing convention rights, under Article 8 private and family life and Article 10 freedom of expression). [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
However, fairly obviously there are two criteria:• Domestic• Violence[4] In general terms, domestic violence occurs in a relationship of a domestic nature, typically husband and wife or de facto partners, whereas family violence occurs in a broader family relationship, eg parent to child.[5] The mistake that is often made is to fail to recognise abuse that is not physical, which can clearly be identified as domestic violence.[6] A useful definition, as good as any out… [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
The Code does not typically have special rules for special areas of practice, but family violence is not strictly a family law matter. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
Den Otter’s recent book and blog post, defending plural marriage, are the latest entries. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am
Aditya Bandopadhyay, has examined the relevant provisions of the Right to Information Act while deciding a matter relating to the denial of right of right of inspection and re-evaluation of question papers by the Central Board of Secondary Education. [read post]
