Search for: "In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. M. S. and A. M. A., Parents"
Results 1 - 20
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 6:12 am
The case of Re W (Children) [2012] EWCA Civ 999, decided today, involved a father's successful appeal against the dismissal of his application for direct contact with his daughters. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
I’m not sure why they think a signature is all it takes to terminate a parent-child relationship…because that’s definitely not how it works in Illinois. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
When considering applications under Section 8 of the Children Act 1989, the court has regard to the child’s welfare and in particular the factors set out in the welfare checklist at Section 1(3) of Children Act 1989. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:33 am
"The mother appealed against this determination of the judge.Held: After reviewing Re M (Abduction: Zimbabwe) [2007] UKHL 55, the leading authority on the exercise of the discretion to order the return of children who have become settled, Lady Justice Black found (at paragraph 26): "that the judge both failed to state the Re M principles and failed to apply them. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:19 pm
I'm not a fan -- at all -- of having kids watch domestic violence between their parents, or having kids be watched, or driven, by an alcoholic parent. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:03 am
We're sure that those children are harmed. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 2:10 pm
If the kid's in danger, it doesn't matter whether the danger is "because" of the parent. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:42 am
An excerpt: Kristina C., the mother of five-year-old Alissa M. and two-year-old K.C., appeals the juvenile court‟s September 29, 2105 order terminating her parental rights and identifying adoption as the permanent plan for her two daughters. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:30 pm
The federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) requires that the court inquire into whether either parent has Native American ancestry before we terminate parental rights; it's motivated by a shameful history of wrongfully taking away children from Native American parents. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 8:03 pm
No matter what, your parents will be happy to see you. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:40 am
And I’m not alone. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 1:37 pm
I must, as a matter of law and as set out above, weigh public policy concerns against the welfare of these particular children. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 11:09 am
The judgment following the rehearing in the case of M (Children) [2016] EWCA Civ 61 (02 February 2016) has now been published, see Re M (No 2) [2016] EWHC 1658 (Fam) (19 May 2016), a judgment of Newton J. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:51 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Private Severance)In the Matter of L. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Parental rights as they pertain to children and families are vast. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:37 am
They have always asked if I needed anything for the children and they ask questions about the parents and document everything I say. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
It didn’t matter what the current situation was or what it would be if the order was implemented, all that mattered was the decision as to whether the children might be reasonably expected to live with the father as well as the mother. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:37 am
Furthermore, denying children the benefit of social insurance simply because their parents were not married to one another was inconsistent with international obligations regarding the welfare of children. [read post]
