Search for: "In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. S"
Results 1 - 20
of 152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2014, 6:04 am
The court terminated respondent-mother’s parental rights to all four children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(i), (g), (j), and (k)(iii), and terminated respondent-father’s parental rights to his three children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(ii), (g), and (j). [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Greg Abbott’s campaign representative (Abbott is standing for re-election in 2022) Dave Carney casually confessed that the governor was pursuing this issue because “it’s a 75% to 80% winner” at the polls. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Broadly: divorce, civil partnership and financial matters are not 'relevant family proceedings'. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:13 am
” He considered the principles established by the House of Lords in In re J [2005] and decided it was in Saleem’s best interest to return to Morocco. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
And so the matter came to hearing. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:44 am
Whilst elements of the welfare checklist were considered in this case it is apparent that Section 1 of the Children Act was not applied in its entirety. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:16 am
A.C. 5101:2-42-18 (Children’s Services’ approval of placements with substitute caregivers) (B)(2) (For any potential caregiver or adult in the household, a search of the statewide automated child welfare information system (SACWIS) must be completed per A.C. 5101:2-33-22.) [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
A.B.C. in the matter of P.C., a minor, __ N.J. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 10:50 am
Now that the decision in out in In re Z.J.G., I feel like I can write about the reason this case was so important–beyond what I would consider the obvious (parent’s testimony), which I detailed in this post here. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
’ The application under the Convention was granted by Pauffley J, and the mother’s appeal to the Court of Appeal was refused. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 1:40 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Notice)In re Rhoades (Prisoners - Religious Freedom; Tobacco)U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:17 am
(Child Custody - Removal of Indian Children) In re Shirley T. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:17 am
(Child Custody - Removal of Indian Children) In re Shirley T. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:33 am
There are 3 children of the relationship: T, who is now aged 8, J now aged 12 and K now aged 10.On 3rd February 2005 the father stabbed the mother, who died from her injuries. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
The child welfare and juvenile justice systems are both plagued by systemic and structural racism. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:33 am
On Friday, the Michigan Supreme Court clarified the steps trial courts must take to ensure that the notice requirements under the Indian Child Welfare Act (“ICWA”) are strictly enforced in a consolidated order resolving two cases, In re C I Morris Minor, Case No. 142759 and In re J L Gordon Minor, Case No. 143673. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Mississippi originally adopted the existing Indian family doctrine in Matter of B.B.[25], but the case’s jurisdiction was postponed by Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:00 pm
”); Matter of C.H., 997 P.2d 776 (Mont. 2000) (similar); and Matter of S.E.G., 521 N.W.2d 357 (Minn. 1994) (similar); see also Michael J. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 5:52 pm
For publication opinions today (1): In In the Matter of K.B. and B.L.; A.B.L. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 2:33 am
[In re J. [read post]
