Search for: "In the Interest of: D.H." Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2016, 5:51 am
Div. 2004) (stating that `[d]ismissal is the last resort because the public interest, the rights of victims and the integrity of the criminal justice system are at stake’). [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 1:01 pm
The case (In the Interest of D.H.) required the Court to decide whether Georgia's possession of marijuana statute created a mandatory presumption of guilt in violation of constitutional due process guarantees. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:11 pm
The New Jersey Appellate Division recently handed down an interesting decision regarding termination of parental rights and kinship legal guardianship interpreting the Kinship Legal Guardianship Act in New Jersey. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 7:09 am by Brian Leiter
Professor Mellor, who spent his career at Cambridge University, was best-known for his work in metaphysics, although his philosophical interests ranged widely. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:37 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Tein (Tribal Sovereign Immunity)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlIn the Interest of D.H., JR. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 1:37 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Tein (Tribal Sovereign Immunity)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlIn the Interest of D.H., JR. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Together, those two opinions create a split with the Fifth Circuit (in its D.H. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 11:21 am by Sandy T. Fox
When it comes to the issue of a substantial change in circumstances, the case of D.H. and A.H. is a useful one. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 11:15 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I just ran across an interesting 2009 case that I thought I’d note for our readers. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  It is unlikely that Iowa would probably accept that argument, however, based upon the decisions of the North Dakota Supreme Court in the case of In the Interest of A.B.[23] and the Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of In the Matter of Baby Boy L.[24]. [read post]