Search for: "In the Interest of: G.S., Appeal of: G.S." Results 61 - 80 of 252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2020, 9:19 am by Brittany Williams
The defendant contended that the civil lawsuit was relevant because it showed that the Parkers had an interest in the outcome of the criminal prosecution. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:31 pm by Jamie Markham
Whatever the relevant facts may be, the court of appeals has said a trial court is not limited to the elements of the conviction offense in finding them. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:13 am by Jonathan Holbrook
But their holding was supplemented by this interesting footnote: We note that Defendant argues State v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:09 pm by Shea Denning
Notwithstanding the defendant’s release, the Court addressed the merits of the petition pursuant to the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:22 am by Jeff Welty
The court of appeals first addressed the defendant’s constitutional challenge to G.S. 14-415.1. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:47 am by Jeff Welty
The issuance of the injunction pending appeal indicates that the panel believes the plaintiffs are likely to prevail on the merits, but the matter is to be briefed expeditiously and argued in December. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 6:01 am by Jeff Welty
See generally G.S. 15A-241 (defining a search warrant as an order authorizing the search of “designated premises, vehicles, or persons”). [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 2:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
So holds today's unanimous decision of the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court in Appeal of G.S., in an opinion by Judge Ellen Ceisler: [T]he Rose Tree Media School District …. expel[led] G.S. from Penncrest High School[, on the grounds that he] … had violated its Student Discipline Code by posting violent song lyrics on Snapchat despite the fact that G.S. had put up the offending post at a time when he was neither on-campus nor involved in… [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:26 am by Jacquelyn Greene
The choice among them must be driven by the disposition level allowed by G.S. 7B-2508 and the five factors outlined in G.S. 7B-2501(c). [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 8:13 am by Jonathan Holbrook
The defendant was convicted of threatening a court officer under G.S. 14-16.7(a), and appealed. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:26 pm by Shea Denning
Anything else in the list of crossover bills grab your interest? [read post]