Search for: "In the Interest of: L.E." Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2009, 2:39 pm
Though the Supreme Court's Heller ruling does not yet officially apply to the states, this legal reality has not prevented a North Carolina appeals court from handing down this interesting opinion rejecting a Heller-based Second Amendment challenge to a state prosection for felon in possession. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:01 pm
Matt was a joy to talk with -- witty, intelligent and interesting. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:16 pm
However, given the evidence in the record, we find that a modification of Father's visitation would serve the best interests of L.E. and J.E. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
Pannell Prospect Pruce Pine Unnamed Occurrences Soapstone Branch Prospect Transylvania County Jennings No. 1 Mine L.E. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
    This leads to the need for rules governing the possibility of access by interested parties to information held by public authorities. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:20 pm by Colin Miller
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 276, 109 S.Ct. 1775, 104 L.E.2d 268 (1989) (O’Connor, J., concurring), a gender discrimination case, under a mixed-motive theory, which was very different from the case at bar. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:06 am by Martin George
KNÖFEL , Oliver Taming the Leviathan – Liability of States for Sovereign Acts (Acta Iure Imperii) as a Challenge for EU Private International Law   Group 4 – ARBITRATION ASON, Agnieszka The Revised Brussels Regulation: A New Approach To Arbitration in the European Rulemaking HAUBERG WILHEMSEN, Louise European Perspectives on International Arbitration ZACARIASIEWICZ, Maciej Vindicating public interest through application of mandatory rules in international commercial… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:37 am by 1 Crown Office Row
McB. v L.E. 5 October [2010] ECR I-nyr at paragraph 53 the Third Section of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU) interpreted ed this provision of the Charter as meaning that where Charter rights paralleled ECHR rights the CJEU should follow any clear and constant jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
-EV] Professors Akhil Amar and Vik Amar have submitted an interesting amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:22 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix
McB. v L.E. 5 October [2010] ECR I-nyr at paragraph 53 the Third Section of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU) interpreted ed this provision of the Charter as meaning that where Charter rights paralleled ECHR rights the CJEU should follow any clear and constant jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
Readers who may be interested in submitting a guest post should please feel free to contact me. [read post]