Search for: "In the Interest of A.C.C."
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2009, 9:01 am
In light of the fact that Copeland has a legitimate interest in A.C.C., we cannot say that registration of the custody orders is “tacit†recognition of Copeland and Spivey’s relationship. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:12 am
Elizabeth A.C.C., which held that a person who was neither a biological nor an adoptive parent could establish standing as a parent to petition for custody and visitation, the Court ruled “that the ultimate determination of whether to grant those rights rests in the sound discretion of trial courts in determining the best interests of the child. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:12 am
Elizabeth A.C.C., which held that a person who was neither a biological nor an adoptive parent could establish standing as a parent to petition for custody and visitation, the Court ruled “that the ultimate determination of whether to grant those rights rests in the sound discretion of trial courts in determining the best interests of the child. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:12 am
Elizabeth A.C.C., which held that a person who was neither a biological nor an adoptive parent could establish standing as a parent to petition for custody and visitation, the Court ruled “that the ultimate determination of whether to grant those rights rests in the sound discretion of trial courts in determining the best interests of the child. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 6:07 pm
If you’re interested in meeting to discuss your case, I can offer a free half-hour initial consultation to potential clients. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Elizabeth A.C.C., 28 N.Y.3d 1 (2016) recognized that a person who was not a biological or adoptive parent could establish standing as a parent to petition for custody and visitation. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
March 16, 2020 Recent Articles of Interest An article by Joel R. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Granville(2000), in which it held that a Washington statute that allowed any person to petition for visitation with someone else’s child based solely on the child’s best interests could not be constitutionally applied to override a mother’s decision to curtail visitation with her children’s paternal grandparents.That ruling, although only a plurality, sharply differentiated between parents and non-parents and took a robust view of the parental right to exclude. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Elizabeth A.C.C. (28 NY3d 1 [2016]), which expansively defined who is a Aparent@ under Domestic Relations Law ' 70. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Elizabeth A.C.C. (28 NY3d 1 [2016]), which expansively defined who is a Aparent@ under Domestic Relations Law ' 70. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm
Elizabeth A.C.C. (2016), the court held that “where a petitioner proves by clear and convincing evidence that he or she has agreed with the biological parent of the child to conceive and raise the child as co-parents, the petitioner has presented sufficient evidence to achieve standing to seek custody and visitation of the child. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Conclusory and nonspecific allegations relating to a change in circumstances are insufficient to justify a hearing on the issue of whether a change in custody would be in the best interests of the child. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
” Pursuant to Family Ct Act § 532(a), a genetic marker test may not be ordered if it is not in the best interests of the child on the basis of equitable estoppel. [read post]
