Search for: "In the Interest of D. M. (Dissenting Opinion)" Results 41 - 60 of 710
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2012, 3:27 am by Russ Bensing
  That opinion was also 8-1, but this time it was Sotomayor dissenting. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:49 am
(The opinions are announced in reverse order of seniority.)AND: Trinity Lutheran — the case I'm most interested in — is written by the Chief Justice. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Reynolds and unfairly revisited.Judge Brown also dissented, quite vigorously. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:33 pm by Seth Davis
Judge Henderson dissented from the denial of the petition for the reasons she had already given in her dissent from the panel’s opinion, namely, that in her reading the F-1 statute did not authorize the rule. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm by Josh Blackman
  National Security Judge Shedd’s dissent, which was joined by Judges Niemeyer and Agee, charged that the majority opinion disregards the “potentially grave consequences for our country. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 2:35 am by Aaron L. Nielson
” Here is Politico’s introduction: Fischer is a long opinion — with the lead opinion by Judge Pan, an opinion concurring in the judgment by Judge Walker that may be the controlling one on a key issue, and a dissent by Judge Katsas. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:02 am by Eugene Volokh
But I thought I’d post today about three possible interests — protecting health, providing for sex equality, and protecting newly created private rights — and say a few words about them. 1. [read post]
14 May 2019, 1:20 pm by Sasha Volokh
I'm not going to resolve that debate here, but I want to raise a number of interesting points. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Were we to do that, who knows where it might lead.And it's not just Scalia dissenting in Holland and Boggs dissenting in D'Ambrosio. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 2:35 am by Aaron L. Nielson
” Here is Politico’s introduction: Fischer is a long opinion — with the lead opinion by Judge Pan, an opinion concurring in the judgment by Judge Walker that may be the controlling one on a key issue, and a dissent by Judge Katsas. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:40 am
But even without that experience I'd still find the opinion spot on. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
The majority of the Court — judging from the main opinion (by Chief Justice Roberts) and the Gorsuch concurrence — says "critical mass" as if it's practically nonsense, and the dissenters avoid it — perhaps because as long as they've lost, they have something else they'd prefer to say about the reason for supporting affirmative action. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 1:53 pm by Aaron L. Nielson
Here is a key paragraph setting forth the disagreement: I’m counting Guedes for half, however, because of this discussion: I’m not including the consolidated FERC cases, however, though this is an interesting passage: Finally, why not end with Cases Involving Race Cars? [read post]
7 May 2009, 11:39 am
 Those of you with the DVD, or a more recent viewing in your memories, can add any corrections in the comments).I'm wondering whether the timing of this report of proposed legislation-- banning erectile dysfunction ads from the daytime television -- is just a coincidence, or whether Justice Stevens's recent dissent in FCC v. [read post]