Search for: "In the Interest of D. M. (Majority Opinion)"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,873
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2020, 2:59 pm
[Three interesting opinions: a sound majority, a plausible concurrence, and another concurrence focused on "hate speech" that I think is unsound.] [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:27 am
”Justice Alito, joined by Chief Justice Roberts, concurring in the judgment: (I try to largely track, for this and later opinions, the numbering in the discussion of the majority opinion.)(0) The law is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:22 am
(I’m betting Pryor will name the Army anyway in his notice of appeal this time.) [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:27 am
Guess who was the author of the majority opinion in Connick? [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 9:31 am
On that one I'm closer to the majority position. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:37 am
In a brief search, I didn’t find recent empirical data on these questions, though I’m sure it exists. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:43 pm
In this post, I thought I’d approach the opinion from a different perspective. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm
Like Orin, I think it’s a very interesting question, but I confess my instinct about the answer is different from his. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 7:03 pm
I’m not a fan. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:49 am
The unprecedented leak of a draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 2:35 am
Circuit Review — Reviewed in 2015 because I’m an “admin law” person and the D.C. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 1:32 pm
The FTC’s rule would be a major policy change, regulating future contracts and retroactively voiding current ones. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
D. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 3:35 pm
Justice Dirk Sandefur's majority opinion (jointed by Justices Laurie McKinnon, Beth Baker, and Ingrid Gustafson) in State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm
One searches the majority's opinion in vain, however, for any mention of petitioner Coleman's right to a criminal proceeding free from constitutional defect or his interest in finding a forum for his constitutional challenge to his conviction and sentence of death. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 4:23 pm
Nonetheless, on the merits, I think it's pretty clearly wrong.I'd have suggested the opinion as valuable reading wholly apart from my fundamental disagreement with its conclusion. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 2:42 pm
According to Meyers, the State had postulated "irrelevant grounds in order to persuade a majority of this court into granting review on an issue that seems interesting and important. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 8:54 am
It's interesting that only Sotomayor and Ginsburg dissent. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:46 am
First, as a theoretical matter (and since I’m an academic, I’ll start with the theory), it is highly interesting that this Court has embraced and expanded judge-made exceptions to patentability. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:26 am
The majority opinion ends with a prejudice analysis, which I believe is the weakest part of the decision. [read post]
