Search for: "In the Interest of D.S."
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
In the Interest of D.S., No. 17 WAP 2011 (Pa. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 2:55 pm
-D.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:00 pm
D.S. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:27 am
I blogged about this case in April, when the Iowa Court of Appeals decision came down, but I thought I’d revisit it now that the Iowa Supreme Court has affirmed (though on other grounds), see In the Interest of D.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 7:23 am
The juvenile court in In the Interest of D.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:00 pm
By Rachel D.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:57 pm
D.S. et al v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 2:29 pm
In re D.S. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:00 pm
WEST (D.C. 3-30-2010) and D.S. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 2:56 pm
The DC Court of Appeals in IN RE D.S., K.M., B.S., R.S., T.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:25 am
D.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In re D.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 8:42 am
., Revco D.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:15 am
D.S., App. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 7:09 am
D.S. was 2 ½ years old. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 6:50 am
D.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:16 am
D.S., at para 17. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 6:37 am
The opinion is 28 pages long and the court addresses notice (actual notice was sufficient even if not strictly ICWA compliant), active efforts (happened), state law requirements (harmonious with ICWA), standard of proof (met), jury instructions (adequate), expert witness testimony (was interesting) . . . [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 9:04 am
These interests are furthered by barring evidence of the victim’s prior sexual abuse. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 8:46 am
” Although appellant may have suspected that D.S. was younger than 16 years old, on this record, it is also reasonable to infer that appellant believed that D.S. was 16 years old. [read post]
