Search for: "In the Interest of M.M. (Complete Opinion)" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2010, 5:27 am by Susan Brenner
McEllistrem, made a proffer of his testimony, which included his opinion that (1) there was no `grooming’ activity . . . as you would normally find with sex offenders, because the girls were sexually experienced; (2) Hofus valued the text communications as `fantasy alone’; and (3) Hofus was not a hebophile (having an abnormal sexual interest in youthful women with some secondary sexual characteristics) or a pedophile (having an abnormal sexual interest in… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:37 pm by Rick
Can I interest you in some “freedom fries”? [read post]