Search for: "In the Interest of Na B" Results 161 - 180 of 283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2022, 8:33 pm by Melinda Bell
Sex-based harassment 16(b) The definition of harassment on the ground of sex[1] will be amended to remove the element of “seriousness”. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:53 am by Mark Tushnet
I think I may have written one purely normative constitutional article – and that one never found a home in a law review, though I still think its analysis was both sound and interesting. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:49 pm by Howard Knopf
”Omnibus bills raise interesting and even existentially important questions about the democratic process. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
He criticised Motors’ proof of use evidence, meaning its likelihood of confusion (5(2)(b)) case failed. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 10:07 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
Although we hope to provide you with interesting posts ourselves, we have also been pleased to hear people like our blog because of the interesting discussions below the blogposts. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Introduction: Jeanne Fromer Private actors pursue their own interests. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am by admin
As with his naïve utilitarianism, Bentham’s contributions to jurisprudence often ignored the realities of human experience and decision making. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The parties executed a Settlement Agreement on February 7, 2018, and an Addendum on March 6, 2018 (the “Agreement” or “Settlement Agreement”) (Bowler affirmation, exhibits A, B), both intended to provide a framework for concluding eight years of contentious litigation regarding breach of various contracts that assigned to Day “an interest in certain royalties from [The Princeton Review] (“TPR”) and Random House” (mem at 9). [read post]
” Andrea Ferrara, CHRO at PepsiCo Beverages NA, couldn’t agree more. [read post]