Search for: "In the Interest of R.W., Minor Child"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2012, 10:30 pm
However, if the best interests of the child were the only concern, genetic testing would almost never be ordered to rebut a presumption of paternity because any disruption in the child’s life would be considered not to be in the best interests of the child. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:00 am
R.W. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 4:54 pm
(minor) and Jimmy R. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
HAMILTON; from Val Verde County; 4th district (04-06-00782-CV, 269 SW3d 613, 02-27-08, pet. denied Sep. 2009, pet. denied Sep. 2009)08-0881IN THE MATTER OF T.A., A JUVENILE; from Midland County; 11th district (11-06-00342-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 09-04-08, pet. denied Sep. 2009)(juvenile case, delinquent conduct by committing the offense of unauthorized use of a vehicle on six separate occasions) as redrafted08-0917IN THE INTEREST OF J.I.M., A MINOR; from El Paso County; 8th district… [read post]
