Search for: "In the Interest of Rjm"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
It is somewhat tangential to what is usually covered, so we would doubtless welcome comments on whether this is of interest to our astute and loyal band of readers.* The facts, briefly (some of them from the CA decision): The claimant, RJM, suffers from mental health problems. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:14 pm
While this case will be of interest to those who deal with the decreasing numbers who might be caught up in a similar factual situation, it is also very interesting to compare the two different approaches to proportionality, see [31]-[44] & [63]-[65] on the one hand and [48]-[59] & [68]-[69] on the other. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 5:06 am
Kudos to the Seventh Circuit for taking a number of these issues in the case of Evory v RJM Acquistions Funding, LLC decided on October 23, 2007. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 5:06 am
Kudos to the Seventh Circuit for taking a number of these issues in the case of Evory v RJM Acquistions Funding, LLC decided on October 23, 2007. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 7:30 am
We were interested in how many lawsuits are being filed by Capital One and by some of the debt buyers across the state. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 7:49 am
RJM Acquisitions LLC, 449 F.3d 926, 934 (9th Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 8:34 am
Perrin & Nissen received an earlier version of the packaging in 1998 from SAS's predecessor in interest, RJM Ventures (the filer of the ITU, in case you don't remember), which stated "Amazing Elastic PlasticTM is a Trademark of RJM Ventures Ltd. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Two weeks ago, before Senate Republicans aborted their sham trial of Donald Trump, I thought of the title for this column: “How Much Worse Will Trump Become, and How Quickly? [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm
The best interests of children are a primary consideration: see, for example, R (JS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) per Elias LJ at paras 42 to 46. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm
The best interests of children are a primary consideration: see, for example, R (JS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) per Elias LJ at paras 42 to 46. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
It is interesting to ponder, however, the extent to which the particular discrimination status involved (prisoner as opposed to non-prisoner) influenced the Court to hold that this was an area of social policy where a high threshold of irrationality is required before the courts will interfere. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm
YA v London Borough of Hammersmith And Fulham [2016] EWHC 1850 (Admin) YA was in care with H&F for a number of years and was now a care leaver. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Finally, there are two points that may be of practical interest to criminal practitioners. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
None of the NCT entities have a bank or financial institutions charter or a license from the State of Illinois entitling them to charge interest at more than 9%. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Also differences based on housing status has been held to be within Art 14 (Larkos v Cyprus 30 EHRR 597, R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] 1 AC 311).If the arguments were right, it would affect many provisions of the Housing Acts and Rent Acts. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 8:22 am
RJM Plumbing, inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2012, 1:36 pm
HB is a form of ‘possession’ for the purposes of Article 1 Protocol 1 (RJM [2009] 1 AC 311). [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
RJM Acquisitions, LLC, 499 F.3d 926, 938 (9th Cir. 2007) (citing S. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
RJM Acquisitions, LLC, 499 F.3d 926, 938 (9th Cir. 2007) (citing S. [read post]
