Search for: "In the Interest of TM"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,002
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2017, 10:05 am
One interesting thing is blending of © thinking and emergent TM thinking that allows courts to give injunctive relief for the first time in TM cases. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
We do presume TM dominates state and common law doctrines, and to the extent that unfair competition/misappropriation runs afoul of TM’s animating principles, TM wins out. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm
Will also make 2018, when ©s begin to expire, an interesting moment. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
TM and UC then became jurisdictional—TM could be under federal statute, but UC common law. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 8:15 am
TMS therapy requires multiple treatment sessions. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
Be stricter about TM use. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
Competitive interests need to be looked at throughout the life of the TM/design. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
What are the legitimate interests protected by TM? [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Knocked out on bad faith, which is an interesting place to find an ornamentality objection. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:34 pm
Dinwoodie: Google France is an interesting parallel to the US cases—use in internal communications. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:38 am
Unfortunately, the applicant did not respond to the procedural invitation to submit its observations, so we may never find out if this would make an interesting case. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
Which raises questions about the appropriate remedy: remedy based on the word Flanax would be a TM remedy.McKenna: but if the remedy against the word comes from (and against) someone who owns TM rights in the word, then it’s a TM back door.Litman: intentional deceptive marketing. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Sounds less interesting. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
But one of the harms we’re interested in is an intangible that is very dynamic, consumer understanding, which means we want a second regime, tort-like. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:35 am
TM ought to have a different spin on public interest: consumer confusion is bad. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
(A copyright type interest.) [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Paul Gugliuzza: we first have to figure out what TM’s internal policies are, which is fascinating to a person whose first interests are in patent, which is about invention. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 9:01 am
ECHR says TM applications are "property"Hot off the press, via Lovells' trade mark expert and scholar Burkhart Goebel, is news that the European Court of Human Rights has today done the right and proper thing. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Ramsey: BB is interesting because they used a public domain image on the shirt. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 2:20 pm
Underlying Q of what TM is for. [read post]
