Search for: "In the Interest of WER" Results 21 - 32 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2008, 2:06 am
The review, as (seemingly) is interesting in its own right. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 7:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Williamson counters that the governmental interest was "about as low as it gets," even considering her relative culpability. [read post]
21 May 2011, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
  It is curious that the Report contains no discussion of the two first instance cases where the court has considered the point and has held that this was not necessary (WER v REW [2009] EMLR 304; TUV v Persons Unknown [2010] EWHC 853 (QB)). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:22 am by Giesela Ruehl
Art. 9 EuGVO): Ein Danaergeschenk des EuGH für die Opfer von Verkehrsunfällen (656) Ulrich Magnus, Gerichtsstandsvereinbarungen im Vorschlag zur Reform der EuGVO (664) Heinz-Peter Mansel, Grenzüberschreitende Restschuldbefreiung – Anerkennung einer (automatic) discharge nach englischem Recht und ordre public (683) Jörg Pirrung, Vorrangige, beschleunigte und Eilverfahren vor dem Europäischen Gerichtshof in Ehe- und Sorgerechtssachen (698) Herbert Roth, Wer ist… [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Furthermore, it is clear that intervention was conceived as a procedurally exceptional situation, which is justified only by a substantial legitimate interest of the assumed infringer to enter the opposition proceedings. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:13 am by flo
Er warf dabei Fragen auf wie: Wer soll über eine „Trennung vom Internet“ entscheiden (Kompetenz-Frage)? [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 10:28 am by Russell Knight
Furthermore, the court is likely to call in the accuser and the report-maker as witnesses to determine the best interest of the child(ren). [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm by Nico Cordes
In the present case case, the form 2300 indicated "BYK-Chemie GmbH" as opponent, whereas the attached document containing the indication of facts, evidence and arguments mentioned "Einsprechende: BASF Coatings GmbH" just before the heading "EINSPRUCHSBEGRÜNDUNG".Due to this seemingly contradictory information, the opposition division held the identity of the opponent not to be sufficiently established before expiry of the opposition period, and as a… [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 2:08 am by Jessica Kroeze
Questions 1 and 2 are interesting for querying the extent of the right to be heard in proceedings before the EPO. [read post]