Search for: "In the Matter Of: S & P, Incorporated, Debtor,appeal of S & P, Incorporated"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am
The husband appealed the bankruptcy court’s decision to the U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am
The husband appealed the bankruptcy court’s decision to the U.S. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
PROSAIC PEDESTRIAN PROSE & JUDGE POSNERDiscover Bank's motion to strike pro bono amicus brief Appealing from summary judgment against him, Discover Bank credit card judgment debtor filed tale-of-woe brief in all-Republican state Court of Appeals in Dallas (the Other Fifth Court of Appeals) and had it duly found fault with for formal deficiencies.Pro Se litigants cannot, after all, be treated differently. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:19 pm
It’s probably a matter of priorities. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
In the matter of C (Children), heard 9-10 Oct 2017. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:54 am
Van Calster’s blog, Agrokor DD – Recognition of Croatian proceedings shows the impact of Insolvency Regulation’s Annex A.)[1] However, a new and contrary development seems to be an order by the Slovenian Supreme Court in case Cpg 2/2018 of 14 March 2018.[2] The Slovenian forum refused to grant exequatur to Croatian extraordinary administration as a way of divestiture of insolvent debtor. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
LUCINDA VINE; KRISTY POND, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.PLS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; PLS LOAN STORE OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellants.No. 16-50847.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.Filed May 19, 2017.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 3:16-CV-31.Before: BARKSDALE, GRAVES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM.[*]Appellants PLS Financial Services, Inc., and PLS Loan Store of… [read post]
3 May 2016, 3:50 am
S. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The order appealed from was vacated. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 10:31 am
P. 1001 advisory committee’s note to 1987 amendments. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
There is good reason to conclude that the alteration does matter here. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
This appeal ensued. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
The Court disposed of this argument by mis-citing a prior precedent of its own for the proposition that the debtor must specifically raise the lack-of-notice issue in his pleadings to preserve a complaint about it for appeal. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
(LexisNexis 2007) ¶ 108.02[3], p. 108-7.) [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
P. 736. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
”[10] The Third Circuit panel insisted on an objective test with the burden being placed on the debtor:[11] Though a debtor’s subjective intent may be relevant, good faith falls “more on [an] objective analysis of whether the debtor has sought to step outside the ‘equitable limitations’ of Chapter 11. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 12:33 pm
As one whose practice, for decades, revolved around Supreme Court cases, court of appeals cases and trial court cases involving major antitrust matters, I do not ever remember hearing or reading of remarks like Sheehan’s being made in open court. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
The court of appeals reversed. ___ S.W.3d ___, ___ (Tex. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
Lundin, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy §164.1, p. 164–1, and n. 4 (3d ed. 2000) (hereinafter Lundin (2000 ed.)) [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
The court of appeals reversed. ___ S.W.3d ___, ___ (Tex. [read post]
