Search for: "In the Matter of Adoption of John Doe"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,808
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2015, 1:58 pm
” This OP (which does not use the verb “decides” and is not adopted under Article 41) has the effect of urging the US to carry out its commitments in the JCPOA, including the lifting of sanctions, but it does not require the US to do so as a matter of international law. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 12:45 pm
It formally puts the court in the position of adopting the decree as its own order. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
Harper – Chief Justice John Roberts showed that he is the final arbiter of voting-rights disputes at the Court, at least for now. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:58 am
Teaching criminal law at Fordham Law School, John Pfaff posts at PrawfsBlawg about the Supreme Court's recent decision in Cavazos v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:23 am
Congress does achieve the [effect of a penalty rather than a tax] by adopting the criteria of wrongdoing and imposing its principal consequence on those who transgress its standard. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 11:21 am
John Doe #2, perhaps, gets the benefit of Supreme Court rule-making, according to this opinion; but first John Doe #1 has to have his cover blown. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:29 am
Congress responded to that evidence by adopting legislation that requires all criminal aliens to remain in custody while they appeal a removal order. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:16 am
Sources: In Re: The Petition of Maryann Campbell and Fred Cass as well as In The Matter of John Svenningsen, Deceased. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:16 am
Sources: In Re: The Petition of Maryann Campbell and Fred Cass as well as In The Matter of John Svenningsen, Deceased. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:15 pm
On these matters, the Constitution dictates no answers but entrusts them to a self-governing people to resolve. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm
For any questions or more information on these or any related matters, please contact any attorney in the firm’s corporate practice group. [read post]
17 May 2013, 4:13 am
Whatever the response, you can then can only pray that the client does not threaten to take the matter up with the senior attorney. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:15 am
In John Doe 200 v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm
But that court does not undertake the fact finding and determination of the matter. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
No one cares about the actual legal issue raised in Marbury—whether Congress can add to the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court; it is not relevant to any contemporary litigation, nor, as a matter of fact, does Marbury truly feature as the centerpiece of contemporary articles on constitutional theory, including, for that matter, the propriety of judicial review. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:18 am
The question is whether that outlier matters. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:24 pm
Does that constitute religious discrimination? [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
So a complete answer may well depend on where John Doe happens to be if he applies for a passport and what he seeks to do with it. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
Papa John’s). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:00 pm
“The good news for Republicans is the only ones they need to convince are themselves,” as Vox’s Mathew Yglesias pointed out, “so it doesn’t matter that their case makes no sense. [read post]
