Search for: "In the Matter of Bott" Results 81 - 100 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2008, 7:24 pm
It is by Tom Phillips, a former Texas Supreme Court chief justice (appointed, elected and re-elected between 1988 and 2004), and now Baker Botts partner: As the authors acknowledge, threats to judicial impartiality and the appearance of impartiality will persist no matter how perfectly a state structures its recusal process. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:38 pm
Through that relationship we will be able to use the breadth and reach of the Sonnenschein firm to assist seamlessly on client matters where Sonnenschein attorneys may be useful to Zwillinger Genetski LLP clients. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 7:34 pm by Law Shucks
Baker Botts has been sued for malpractice resulting from alleged conflicts in its representation of a patent client. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 9:06 am by law shucks
Baker Botts has been sued for malpractice resulting from alleged conflicts in its representation of a patent client. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 7:32 am
This is a matter of accountability and constitutional structure. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021  In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021  East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors,… [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:06 am
  He would never throw his hat at me (or his shoe for that matter). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 12:00 am by Race to the Bottom
First, the BBFA Report makes recommendations regarding an appropriate tax plan for the industry—a matter which is not addressed by the TSC Report. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
Phillips, a former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas, now with the law firm of Baker Botts LLP, and Patricia M. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 1:30 pm by John K. Ross
No matter: Eight officers continue detaining the man until the officer develops a second "hunch" that drugs are probably in the house. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for… [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 1:47 am
The panel said the attorney's conduct "throughout the course of this matter has been nothing less than astounding. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the… [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:57 am by Marta Requejo
Leading the seminar were Professor Dr Maxi Scherer, special counsel at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP and the journal’s general editor, and Dr Johannes Koepp, partner at Baker Botts LLP and the special issue editor. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:01 pm by Dennis Crouch
Briefs were also signed by attorneys at K&L Gates, Baker Botts, Amster Rothstein, Perkins Coie, Covington & Burling, and Malloy & Malloy, as well as Eric Albritton from the Albritton firm. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm by Francis Pileggi
  The Boardwalk MLP general partner received an opinion of counsel from the Baker Botts law firm that the condition to exercising the call right had been satisfied. [read post]