Search for: "In the Matter of C. A. S., a juvenile--Appeal from County Court at Law No 3 of Smith County"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2022, 7:21 am
This summary will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:24 am
However, the Court of Appeals considered the argument abandoned because the defendant failed to cite any law indicating a juvenile may not be convicted of felony murder. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:42 pm
This post summarizes published criminal decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals published on November 2, 2021. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:53 pm
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:44 am
The trial court denied the motions for transcript and continuance, and the matter went forward for a second trial on September 3, 2019. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
In this Vance County case, the state appealed from an order granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized from his person and inside a house. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 5:40 am
The Marion County juvenile court allowed public access to a related child-welfare proceeding that stemmed from those concerns. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
C-070752, 2008-Ohio-2980 (appeal of classification under pre-AWA law not moot) Second District In re: State of Ohio, ex rel., Stephen Michael Anspach, 2nd Dist. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
Superior court judge’s order directing the State to disclose contents of criminal investigative file in any criminal matter in which the State intends to call a specified law enforcement officer as a witness was an improper advisory opinion that exceeded the scope of the judge’s power In re Washington County Sheriff’s Office, ___ N.C. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 6:33 am
The appeals court held that the juvenile court entry did not contain sufficient factual findings for the appeals court to determine whether the involuntary dismissal of C.L.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:48 am
Heenan, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Hamilton County, for Appellee State of Ohio Samuel C. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Readler, William C. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
City of Redondo Court: U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 06-56869, 06-55750 September 16, 2011 Judge: Smith Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law Day-laborer organizations challenged a city anti-solicitation ordinance that barred individuals from standing on a street or highway and soliciting, or attempting to solicit, business,… [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
At sentencing, Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas Judge R. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:25 am
State of Indiana , a 27-page opinion, Judge Robb writes:T.S., a minor, appeals from a proceeding in which he was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent based on the juvenile court's finding that T.S. committed an act that if committed by an adult would be the crime of possession of marijuana, a Class A misdemeanor. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Court holds that: 1) textual matter such as emails may be prohibited as "obscene" although not containing pictures; 2) statute could prohibit obscene cartoons of child pornography although cartoons did not depict real life children; 3) the interstate trafficking of obscene materials can be prohibited by law; and 4) the term "receives" is not unconstitutionally vague as applied to receipt of obscenity via computer. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/282538.opn.doc.pdf Federal Law Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:42 am
G.S. 7B-323(c)(3). [read post]
