Search for: "In the Matter of K.H." Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2012, 2:15 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0758, 2012 MT 175, IN THE MATTER OF K.H. and K.M., Youths in Need of Care. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 5:29 am by Jessica C. Diamond
K.H., the Appellate Division made clear that a finding of harassment in connection with the entry of a domestic violence restraining order must be based upon a judge’s findings on all elements of the criminal statute incorporated in the New Jersey Prevention Against Domestic Violence Act, qualified by any subsequent decisional law narrowing or clarifying the statute. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 8:24 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
The KSC ordered additional briefing and set the matter on its May 2021 argument docket.] [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) So holds the Minnesota Court of Appeals in today’s In the Matter of the Welfare of J.J.M. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 10:18 am
" NFP civil opinions today (2): In the Matter of K.H. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 2:09 pm by Unknown
Hudson (Indian Civil Rights Act; Jurisdiction) In re K.H. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 10:22 am
" Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of K.H.; Jessica Hartman v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 7:29 am
[Note - The ILB had a number of entries about this case.]Termination of Parent Child Rel. of A.W., B.W., C.W., E.W., S.W., V.W., and K.H. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
(Or for that matter, visitation only with maternal grandmother). [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
K.H. (1994), 1994 CanLII 17267 (NB CA), 146 N.B.R. (2d) 372, fire “no matter how well planned, is often erratic and unpredictable and gives rise to unforeseen consequences” (at paragraph 6). [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:10 pm
Marion County Department of Child Services (NFP) In the Matter of A.H., K.H. and D.H., Children in Need of Services; J.H. v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 9:08 am by Katherine A. Nunziata
K.H., the defendant was dissatisfied with a trial court’s order, so he filed a motion to vacate that order and, when that was unsuccessful, he filed an appeal. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 10:41 am by Michael Oykhman
This depends on the unique circumstances of each matter and is determined on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:12 pm
Because the DFC caseworker and investigating detective opined that K.H. was touched inappropriately and in a sexual manner by Grandfather, we conclude that Grandparents failed to rebut the presumption accorded to Father. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
How that scrutiny should be applied is a matter left to other articles. [1].Riley v. [read post]