Search for: "In the Matter of Kimberly L. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This matters when understanding the import of Obergefell because the Court ruled for the plaintiffs on all of these issues. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:48 am
Smith, 71 Ind. 44 (1880), to support this proposition. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:39 pm by Jon L. Gelman
It also confuses matters with “airborne transmission” to indicate inhalation exposure exclusively at long distances and does not consider inhalation exposure via the same aerosols at short distances.This artificial distinction needs to be replaced with up-to-date terminology [10], as advocated by the National Academies workshop on Airborne Transmission [11], focused on routes of exposure via a) touch, b) large droplets sprayed onto the body, and c) inhalation of small aerosol… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
(TTABlog) SDNY: STOLICHNAYA case ends again: Federal Treasury Enter. v Spirits Int’l (Property, intangible) Reversing a 2(e)(2) geographical descriptiveness refusal, TTAB asks, where the heck is WINDHOEK? [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Bancorp, et al., No. 15-591 (Whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al., No. 15-559 (Commil re-hash – if actions were “not objectively unreasonable&rdqu [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am by Dennis Crouch
That case had questioned whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
., No. 15-591 (Whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
., No. 15-591 (Whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
., No. 15-591 (Whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 2:25 pm by Bridget Crawford
 Representations of ‘sexting’ and sexual violence on legal dramas: implications for adolescents’ sexual and intimate citizenship Panelist: Emily Lockhart, Socio-Legal Studies, York University Commentator: Charisa Smith       Friday, June 3, 10:15 am to 12:00 pm [Panel 1222] Who's in pain and Who's to blame? [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]