Search for: "In the Matter of Laster" Results 1 - 20 of 209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2014, 5:10 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
" VC Laster's opinions reflect a deep respect for the jurisprudential approach adopted by Delaware courts as a legal matter. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 3:15 am by Liz Dunshee
In response to a growing number of lawsuits that call on the Court of Chancery to rule on matters outside the scope of its mission – specifically, trying to shoehorn employment disputes into matters of internal affairs – Vice Chancellor Laster leads off this 68-page opinion with a plea to make it stop. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:26 am by Ashby Jones
“To reiterate, I have no concerns about the conduct of any attorney involved in this matter. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Somewhat more controversially, VC Laster has been blogging about them on LinkedIn: The Unintended Beneficiaries Of Section 122(18) Round 5 Although I've heard grumblings from various sources that the Vice Chancellor should not be essentially blogging on legal issues, I don't have a problem with it as a general matter. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 2:56 am by CorporateAcquisitions MergerLawBlogger
Vice Chancellor Laster issued a post-trial opinion in the Trados matter on Friday. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 3:00 am by Ann Lipton
Grove, Vice Chancellor Laster held that inspection rights are a matter of internal affairs, and therefore California’s Section 1601, which grants inspection rights to shareholders of California corporations and foreign corporations with headquarters in California, is... [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
We've been busy with other matters but need to turn to a truly remarkable opinion, In re Revlon Shareholders Litigation, another bit of evidence that VC Laster does not intend to be a shrinking violet on the Delaware Chancery Court. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:25 am by Peter J. Sluka
No matter what words the parties used in a contract, the noncompliant act would be voidable, not void. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:49 pm by Ross Todd
Travis Laster did nothing inappropriate, a special counsel concluded in a report released Friday. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Laster went on to say that the Louisiana action is “quite obviously violative” of the forum selection provision in Edgen’s charter, which Laster found to be “valid as a matter of Delaware corporate law. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 6:28 am
While prior Chancery rulings, including Nycal and Rohe, reached largely similar conclusions in related circumstances, VC Laster’s decision in Vaalco clearly articulates his view that this type of charter or bylaw provision that purports to limit director removal for non-classified boards to cases of cause is simply invalid as a matter of Delaware law. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:01 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Harwood Feffer’s predecessor firms have appeared in numerous Delaware cases, including another matter involving MacAndrews & Forbes’ affiliates. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Directors can, as a matter of business judgment, favor certain non-insider creditors over others of similar priority without breaching their fiduciary duties. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
The criticism of plaintiffs' counsel can also be juxtaposed against VC Laster's treatment of management. [read post]