Search for: "In the Matter of Pridgen" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2010, 3:22 am by Ted Frank
The punitive damages of $64 million were based on the $640 million net worth of the defendant, which, as a matter of public policy, acted to punish the defendant for being successful, rather than for wrongdoing. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 4:02 pm
Dee Pridgen generously wrote an account for us of the Consumer Issues Conference held last week at the University of Wyoming. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 6:41 pm by Andrew Langille
The most recent Pridgen decision hasn't been tested in Ontario's Courts while the lower court decision in Pridgen was panned in Lobo v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 1:06 pm
  The theme of the conference is "Money Matters" and it will cover issues regarding credit cards and credit scoring, bankruptcy and debt collection, investment & retirement, and identity theft. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 7:31 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
University of Victoria, the Court of Appeal distinguished the case from Pridgen because it arose out of a disciplinary matter out of a specific statutory context which provided judicial review. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:50 pm by INFORRM
The point has been considered by the courts in a number of jurisdictions, most recently in the Canadian case of Pridgen & Pridgen v University of Calgary ([2012] ABCA 139) which was recently decided by the Court of Appeal in Alberta. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 2:28 am
  If so, as my co-author Dee Pridgen once pointed out to me (in kinder words), I have only myself to blame. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am by INFORRM
But to conflate either with the matter of libel reform is to seriously confuse the issues”. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm by Patricia Hughes
Created by its own governing statute, a university has a body responsible for running it and a body responsible for academic matters, which together address “every aspect of university governance and operations” (para. 43), with the involvement of faculty and students (para. 48). [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm by Peter Tillers
Only if 'the evidence is not such as to allow a finding, [does] the judge withdraw[ ] the matter from [the jury's] consideration.' [read post]