Search for: "In the Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v. Common Council of the City of Albany"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 12:56 pm
Basch (Chief Judge Lippman dissents in Labor Law sec. 240(1) case) and Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 7:34 am
In Save the Pine Bush v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Court of Appeals' decision, please use this link: Matter of Save the Pine Bush Inc., v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 5:34 pm
Basch (Chief Judge Lippman dissents in Labor Law sec. 240(1) case) and Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm
In Matter of Save the Pine Bush v Common Council of the City of Albany, the Court held that both the individual petitioners and the organization had standing to challenge an action that allegedly threatened certain endangered species within the Pine Bush area. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm
In Matter of Save the Pine Bush v Common Council of the City of Albany, the Court held that both the individual petitioners and the organization had standing to challenge an action that allegedly threatened certain endangered species within the Pine Bush area. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
A lead agency ‘need not investigate every conceivable environmental problem’ during the course of SEQRA review (Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 307 [2009]), and ‘generalized community objections or speculative environmental consequences’ are not sufficient to establish a SEQRA violation (Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge… [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
A lead agency ‘need not investigate every conceivable environmental problem’ during the course of SEQRA review (Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 307 [2009]), and ‘generalized community objections or speculative environmental consequences’ are not sufficient to establish a SEQRA violation (Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge… [read post]
