Search for: "In the Matter of Tedder" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2006, 1:15 pm
Last month, the Indiana Supreme Court sent the matter back to Hawkins, ordering him to decide whether to recuse himself instead of delegating the decision to a special judge, as he had in May 2005. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 1:21 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
We decline to contort the statutory language in that manner.Consequently, we reject the court-made, bright-line timing rule set forth in Tedder and applied by the majority below. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 2:35 pm by Kevin Goldberg and Karyn K. Ablin
  Because, while the RMLC filed its action in Pennsylvania, GMR has reason to want the entire matter to be decided in the California case that it brought   Not only is California GMR’s home turf, but the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has proven friendly to the RMLC (and unfriendly to PROs) in the past, handing key rulings to the RMLC when it sued SESAC in a similar antitrust case that was eventually settled and recently has been… [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:45 pm by Kent Scheidegger
In the proceeding, evidence may be presented as to any matter that the court deems relevant to the nature of the crime and the character of the defendant and shall include matters relating to any of the aggravating or mitigating circumstances enumerated in subsections (5) and (6). [read post]