Search for: "In the Matter of United States of America, Petitioner," Results 121 - 140 of 383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2012, 9:50 am by Raffaela Wakeman
They summarize their argument as follows: The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right of Americans to disseminate as well as receive information. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
United StatesDocket: 11-959Issue(s): (1) Whether, when a false statement is made to an individual who has no connection whatsoever to the federal government, the false statement is nonetheless made in a “matter within the jurisdiction” of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:39 am by Leland E. Beck
  The Court has not requested the views of the United States in Christopher. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Media reports indicate that this Ordinance was drafted during the previous regime under the United Progressive Alliance. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:16 pm by RatnerPrestia
 For example in the recent Motorola Mobility decision, the PTAB, in denying a post-grant petition, stated it was “not persuaded [p]etitioner ha[d] shown that the claimed subject matter taken as a whole does not recite a technological feature that is novel and unobvious over the prior art. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:20 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
Image by Sean MacEntee via FlickrUnited States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Judge Liam O'Grady, in a three-page Memorandum and Opinion in In Re Application of the United States of America for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 2703(d) [Case No. 1:11-dm-00003-TCB], this week denied a request by Birgitta Jonsdottir, Jacob Appelbaum and Rop Gonggrijp to shield their Twitter account information from authorities seeking to prosecute… [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 08-1341 Title: United States v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:25 am by Wells Bennett
Cole; that the United States then explicitly denied the existence of any armed conflict, and held to that view until much later; and that al-Nashiri accordingly cannot be tried by military commission as a matter of law. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (Supreme Court of Oklahoma) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the American Gas Association Amicus brief of the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America Amicus brief of the United States Supplemental petitioner’s brief in response to amicus brief of the United States Cases re-listed for this conference from the February 19, 2010 conference: Title: Dutka v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
Tate, Acting Legal Advisor, Department of State, to the Attorneys for the plaintiff in Civil Action No. 31-555 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm by Law Lady
., DELTA/UNITED SPECIALTIES, INC., ALL-SOUTH SUBCONTRACTORS, INC., BRADLEY MASONRY, INC., ET AL., Appellees. 1st District.Attorneys -- Attorney's fees contract -- Trial court erred in denying petition for approval of a straight 40% contingency fee contract for representation of petitioner in a medical malpractice action -- Trial court is required by rule to approve petition as long as it finds that petitioner understood the rights that she was waiving and the terms of the… [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  We have evolved, in the United States and elsewhere. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:46 am by Rumpole
Nice inquiries, but for the courts (and unfortunately for innocent clients) the inquiry ends there.Because in the United States of America, despite what they tell you, innocence really doesn't matter. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Simply put, Section 5 stated that if any jurisdiction wanted to make changes to laws relevant to voting, it first must have that aspiration upheld by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States or a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:38 pm by Tana Fye
  Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. [read post]