Search for: "In the Matter of the Child of: A. B., Mother."
Results 81 - 100
of 1,248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2013, 2:44 pm
Respondent father's recourse under the law as to the mother of the child in this matter was to file criminal charges against her. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:04 am
The law identifies circumstances under which a person, who was not married to the mother at the time of conception or birth of the child, can establish paternity. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 12:48 pm
On one occasion after the father hit B, the child developed a large bruise on the back of his head. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 2:06 pm
Child custody disputes can take many different forms, but no matter what the parents are arguing about, every case has the potential to elicit intense emotions from all of the parties involved. [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:19 pm
Initially, we disagree with the Supreme Court's conclusion that the mother defaulted on the petition (see CPLR 321; Matter of Kindra B., 296 AD2d 456 [2002]; Matter of Tyrell M., 283 AD2d 500 [2001]). [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
Mother filed a motion to dismiss alleging that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:14 pm
Clearly, B is neither the mother nor the father of the child.In the circumstances, Mr Justice Moylan is surely correct that it is for Parliament to determine whether a person in the position of B should be responsible for maintaining the child. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 8:40 pm
Here, the child was removed from the mother's care in June 2006 because of the mother's history of drug use. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:00 am
[B]ecause the proof did not bear out Mother’s other stated purposes, it appears that the main purpose behind Mother’s proposed relocation is to reside with her new husband…. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:30 am
The fourth child, AM, lived with the mother until May 15, 2016 when AM was found dead in her home. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
In this child custody case, a modified custody order violated due process by exceeding the scope of hearing on father’s motion to end mother’s supervised parenting time; custody order vacated and matter remanded in Arizona case summary. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
In this child custody case, a modified custody order violated due process by exceeding the scope of hearing on father’s motion to end mother’s supervised parenting time; custody order vacated and matter remanded in Arizona case summary. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
In this child custody case, a modified custody order violated due process by exceeding the scope of hearing on father’s motion to end mother’s supervised parenting time; custody order vacated and matter remanded in Arizona case summary. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:28 pm
(a) The superior courts of the several counties shall have exclusive jurisdiction in all matters of adoption, except such jurisdiction as may be granted to the juvenile courts. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:00 am
However, unfortunately for these parents, in many cases, the child’s attorney could end up with a third view point so that the judge must sift through the arguments from 3 different points of view, the mother, the father and the child, rather than 2 different points of view, which would be the mother’s and the father’s. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:04 am
Matter of Michael R. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:50 pm
These decision-making factors do not have a strong effect on what really matters, parenting time. [read post]
16 May 2020, 6:06 am
Whose responsibility was it to provide for the child before the matter got to court? [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:49 am
Before going into the substance of this post, it is perhaps important to clarify why the case law of the ECtHR in child abduction matters is of such great importance in Europe and beyond, perhaps for the benefit of our non-European readers. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am
In a footnote the court observed that contrary to the father’s contention, the mother had standing to bring this motion inasmuch as a child in a custody matter does not have full party status (see Matter of Lawrence v. [read post]
